The Fukushima Effect refuses to die down. While the opponents of
Koodankulam continue to raise the Fukushima bogey to demand a complete
stop to nuclear power in India, its proponents say Koodankulam is vastly
different from Fukushima in its geography as well as the safety
principles and record of India’s nuclear power programme. India has
signaled that it will go ahead with nuclear power plants anyway.
Before March 11, 2011, Japan had 54 nuclear reactors in operation,
supplying nearly a third of the world’s third largest economy’s power
requirements.
After a devastating combination of a magnitude 9 earthquake and a
14-metre high Tsunami in Fukushima broke the defences of the Daichi
nuclear power plant on that day, causing reactors to blow up and spill
dangerous levels of radioactivity into the air, sea and ground for miles
around the plant, only two of those 54 reactors are operating. 17 have
been shut down, 35 are under safety inspections, and most of them are
never expected to come back online.
The ‘Fukushima Effect’, however, is much larger than that. It has
caused a global fear of nuclear power, forced countries such as Germany
and Switzerland to shut down existing reactors and forswear atomic power
altogether, and even India and China – the most ambitious proponents of
nuclear power today – to pause.
But, India (and China) is determined that that’s just it – a pause,
not a full-stop. As events in Koodankulam, Tamil Nadu, have shown, we
may not have stopped worrying and learned to love nuclear power --
indeed, the protestors are still sitting out there in and around
Koodankulam, with whatever strength is left in them after the Centre and
state governments showed they weren’t going to shutter a $3 bn project
that has been 25 years in the making and is now just weeks away from
going critical, no matter what – but we are going to go ahead, anyway.
Last week, after being blockaded by anti-nuclear protestors for
nearly six months, some 950 technical and non-technical personnel of the
Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant (KKNPP) returned to the nearly-finished
first 1,000 MW reactor, of the two that are currently under
construction, at the site and began working towards criticality in
three-six months time, after the Jayalalithaa cabinet passed a
resolution on March 19 that the reactor must be commissioned – and power
must start flowing from it – as early as possible.
Anti-nuclear protestors, mainly under the banner of the People’s
Movement Against Nuclear Energy (PMANE), had brought work at the plant
to a grinding halt since October 12 last, forcing even the AIADMK
government with their intense agitation to pass a resolution asking the
Centre to stop all work at the plant until it could attest to, and
convince the local people of, the safety of the project.
The U-turn happened after two panels, appointed by the Centre and the
Jayalalithaa government itself, had given a ‘safe’ chit to the power
plant and the ruling party was past a bypoll to an assembly seat close
to Koodankulam.
Political Management
It was an interesting episode of political management by both the
Centre and the state. While sporadic outbursts of resistance against the
commissioning of the nuclear power station had been taking place since
the late 1980s, the protests grabbed headlines after 117 protestors sat
on an indefinite hunger strike from September 11, 2011 outside a church
in Idinthakarai, the fishing hamlet closest to KKNPP.
The fast was led by Dr. S.P. Udayakumar, a US educated political
scientist and anti-nuclear activist who is convenor of PMANE. While
Udayakumar was fighting the big fight – against nuclear energy per se –
his protest garnered support from locals, especially from fishermen as
well as from thousands in and around the power plant, whose causes for
worry ranged from the destruction of fisheries to displacement and
compensation to radioactivity and health concerns.
With Fukushima still fresh in people’s memory, even intellectuals and
former top government and military officials began a campaign against
nuclear power.
In an effort to prevent the protests from going out of control – as
it had in Jaitapur, Maharashtra, where one protestor was killed in
police firing 10 months earlier -- Chief Minister Jayalalithaa met the
protestors on September 21, 2011 and assured them that their concerns
would be addressed.
The following day, her cabinet passed the ‘stop work’ resolution and
Jayalalithaa made a public appeal to the prime minister. It seemed that
she, as well as the DMK, was on the side of the protestors and the $3 bn
plant would have to be mothballed.
Both the Centre and the Jayalalithaa government also constituted committees to look into the concerns raised.
The Central panel had nuclear safety, oceanography, life sciences and
oncology experts, and they went about systematically dismissing the
various concerns raised. V. Shanta, chairperson of the Cancer Institute,
Adyar, said studies conducted around nuclear reactors in Kalpakkam had
shown no abnormal incidence of cancer and added that the radiation in
that region was lower than the natural radiation levels in some parts of
Kerala.
She added for good measure that “Since the extraordinary safety
measures incorporated in the nuclear reactors have made it safe, the
fear of radiation is totally unfounded.”
N. Sukumaran, director of the School of Life Sciences at VELS
University, Chennai, said that the coolant water released into the sea
from Koodankulam would be only slightly warmer than the sea water itself
and would actually facilitate fish breeding, rather than harm
fishermen’s livelihoods.
Nuclear experts – former Atomic Energy Regulatory Board chairman S.K.
Sharma, former director of the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy
Agency’s radiation safety division M.R. Iyer, former director of
Nuclear Waste Management Group at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre K. Balu
and Suresh Moses Lee of the Safety Research Institute, Kalpakkam –
dismissed fears of a Fukushima-like disaster.
Oceangraphy expert A.E. Muthunayagam said the passive safety measures
included in the Koodankulam plant made it among the safest nuclear
power stations in the world. “If there is any fear even after this, it
is not based on scientific principles,” he declared.
He also raised the possibility for the first time that there were
vested interests behind the protests. The panel had looked into the
protestors’ queries and complaints but had found that they were not
seeking answers to the issues they had raised publicly but were after
some key documents related to the power plant, giving rise to suspicions
about their motives, he said.
Soon after, no less than Prime Minister Manmohan Singh publicly
charged that the protestors were being funded by foreign NGOs to stall
the Russian-built nuclear plant. The Centre said that it had evidence of
such funding. Key leaders of the protest were arrested.
Meanwhile, the other panel, comprising nuclear scientists, including
former DAE chairman M.R. Srinivasan (see interview), studied the safety
features of the power plant and they, too, ruled out a Fukushima-like
disaster.
Within hours of the end of voting for the Sankarankoil bypoll, the
Jayalalithaa cabinet passed a resolution accepting the panel’s report
and calling for the Koodankulam plant to be made operational
quickly.
The protests continue
For the last several months, people across Tamil Nadu have been
experiencing power cuts for as long as 8-10 hours a day, except in
Chennai where it is two hours a day. Most industries have been left
crippled by the power shortage and many workers and factory owners are
considering migrating to other states.
Industry lobby bodies say, if only in half-jest, that while going
nuclear might have long-term ill effects, the acute shortage of power is
enough to kill them much earlier -- Tamil Nadu is reeling under a power
deficit of 3,000 MW.
Little surprise then that the “sudden U-turn” by the state government
last Monday was welcomed by industry representatives and the business
community. Indeed not only did they welcome the decision, some even
organized protests in favour of the Koodankulam plant.
The Madurai District Tiny and Small Scale Industries Association, for
instance, conducted a blood donation camp as part of their 200-strong
‘start KKNPP’ protest.
In Tiruchengode, more than 2,000 people attached to 15 industry
associations took out a procession demading that the government start
Koodakulam without delay and take action against those blocking it.
Tamil Nadu is expected to get 500 MW of electricity following the
commissioning of Unit 1. The second unit, expected to be ready about
seven months after the first, will give another 500 MW to the
power-starved state, while the rest will go to other states through the
national power grid.
The fishermen in the coastal villages of Idinthakarai, Perumanal,
Kuthenkuli, Uvari and elsewhere, though, felt let down by their
government. Udayakumar and 15 other protestors were back on an
indefinite hunger strike, with the support of the fishermen of
Idinthakarai.
“The two committees did not bother to visit the fishing hamlets and
allay the fears of the locals. We have still not got any answers to the
questions we raised regarding the safety of the plant.
The government has not taken our concerns seriously,” says
Udayakumar. “We thought the chief minister was concerned about the
welfare of the fishermen in this region. But the cabinet’s decision a
day after the Sankarankoil byelection has proven once again that she had
been deceiving us all along. We will continue our protest in a peaceful
and democratic manner until the plant is closed forever.”
Jayalalithaa’s five-page statement on the decision to go ahead in
Koodankulam asserted, however, that the Centre’s Experts Group had
answered all the protestors’ questions and had made an elaborate
examination of the technical and safety features of the plant.
In an effort to appease the protesting fishermen, she also announced a
Rs 500-crore package for infrastructure development in and around
Koodankulam, including housing development and roads and even cold
storage for fish and a facility to repair the mechanized boats of
fishermen.
But the fishermen are in no mood for sops. Melrith (42), a mother of
three from Idinthakarai, said they had “not been sitting in protest for
the last five months to bargain for a good deal” from the government.
“If we wanted more money from the government, we could have negotiated
it long ago.
This protest is not for funds. We are concerned about the safety of
our children and their children. We will not withdraw our protest just
because the state government is willing to spend Rs 500 crore on us.”
While the protesting fishermen and their families had earlier raised
health concerns such as loss of potency and the threat of cancer during
the early months of the protest, several of the agitators now raising
serious questions about the country’s nuclear policy.
“Although the scientists claim that the country’s power shortage can
only be solved through nuclear power, even after 50 years of research,
they supply hardly three per cent of our energy needs,” says Mariadas of
Koothenkuli, who has joined the protestors. “The central government
shelved the Sethu Samudram canal project after spending more than twice
as much as the money spent on Koodankulam because it hurt religious
sentiments. Why can’t they shelve Koodankulam on the grounds that it
will affect the health of thousands of fishermen and their families?”
Barely a few kilometers away from Idinthakarai, at the Anu Vijay
township in Chettikulam where KKNPP staff reside, the mood was jubiliant
following the state government’s nod. “We are extremely delighted and
thankful to the chief minister for allowing us to resume our work for
the country,” said KKNPP site director Kasinath Balaji. “Efforts have
resumed on a warfooting and we have requested additional manpower from
all our other branches to ensure speedy commissioning of Unit 1 of the
plant.”